First Amendment auditors test the boundaries of their rights by recording in public or semi-public spaces, primarily targeting public service agencies. These auditors often provoke public personnel to elicit unprofessional responses, which can lead to legal issues and reputational damage for organizations. The auditors financially benefit from viewership on platforms like YouTube; their earnings increase with more engaging videos. Encounters with auditors may unintentionally expose sensitive information as they often engage in social engineering tactics, capturing critical operational details in the process.
First Amendment auditors seek to test if their Constitutional rights are infringed by recording videos in public and semipublic spaces, targeting public service personnel.
Auditors often instigate responses from public service workers to capture unprofessional behavior, which can lead to court battles and damage an organization’s public image.
The outcome of an auditor's engagement can lead to the exposure of sensitive information, as auditors may utilize social engineering strategies and record specific access and security details.
Monetary gain for auditors is tied to video views; more eventful videos attract more subscribers and potential earnings, incentivizing confrontational encounters.
Collection
[
|
...
]