"Ed. Note: A weekly roundup of just a few items from Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog, the Web's first blog devoted to appellate litigation. Check out these stories and more at How Appealing. "Supreme Court asked to block California law against outing trans students; A Catholic legal group contends the state law violates parents' religious rights": Josh Gerstein of Politico has this report."
""Here Are Trump's Options If the Supreme Court Says His Tariffs Are Illegal": Isabel Gottlieb of Bloomberg News has this report. "The Supreme Court made a mess out of gun laws": Law professor Adam Winkler has this essay online at The Los Angeles Times. "The Supreme Court Was Ripe for Another Ideological Food Fight. Then Something Else Happened." Robyn Nicole Sanders has this Jurisprudence essay online at Slate."
""The Supreme Court may leave alone the Voting Rights Act just long enough to keep the GOP from House control in 2026; Republicans' hopes that a Supreme Court redistricting ruling will boost them in 2026 are fading as election deadlines close in": Samuel Benson and Andrew Howard of Politico have this report. "The Growing Power of the President; And the Immense Power of Grand Narratives": Cass Sunstein has this post at his Substack site."
Multiple legal news items cover Supreme Court-related controversies, including challenges to a California law restricting outing transgender students and debate over presidential tariff authority. Coverage highlights the Court's impact on gun regulations and a potential redistricting decision affecting 2026 House control and the Voting Rights Act's enforcement timing. An essay notes an unexpected development that altered an anticipated ideological confrontation at the Court. Commentary examines the expanding powers of the presidency and the influence of prevailing narratives on legal and political outcomes. Sources cited include Politico, Bloomberg, Los Angeles Times, Slate, and a legal Substack.
Read at Above the Law
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]