How an obscure legal theory shaped the immunity decision and Trump's second term
Briefly

The Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. United States establishes that the president holds absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions taken in their official capacity. This decision relies heavily on the unitary executive theory, which posits that the president has ultimate authority over the executive branch. This ruling not only legitimizes expansive presidential power but also prompts discussions about its implications, including potential consequences for future administrations, the dismantling of federal agencies, and due process for migrants.
In Trump v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the president possesses "absolute immunity from criminal prosecution" for actions taken while in office.
The ruling invites discussions on the unitary executive theory, which grants the president extensive control over the executive branch and raises pressing constitutional concerns.
Read at www.npr.org
[
|
]