The article discusses Harvard's response to the Trump administration's review of its federal contracts and grants, following accusations of insufficient action against antisemitism on campus. Harvard President Alan Garber emphasized academic freedom while acknowledging a need for engagement to combat antisemitism, but faced criticism for lacking a clear plan to maintain the university's independence. This hesitation reflected broader fears that Harvard could mirror Columbia University's behavior in caving to governmental pressures, particularly regarding diversity initiatives and protests, raising concerns at campuses nationwide about academic integrity and autonomy.
We still have much work to do, he wrote. He offered no detail about what Harvard would do to protect its independence from the Trump administration.
It was a statement of abdication, said Kirsten Weld, a history professor and the president of the Harvard chapter of the American Association of University Professors, a national group advocating for faculty.
The email, along with a string of actions recently taken by Harvard against academic programmes, faculty and student groups who have been accused of being pro-Palestinian, have fueled anxieties throughout US campuses.
But the actual body of the message indicated no such thing. In the email, Garber briefly touted academic freedom while pledging to engage with the administration to combat antisemitism.
Collection
[
|
...
]