CNN Isn't Afraid of Stephen Miller They Just Know Bad TV When They See It

"Stephen Miller is terrible television, and CNN has every right commercially and editorially to avoid subjecting its audience to him. This isn't ideological. It isn't censorship. It's programming logic, and Miller routinely violates every principle of making watchable TV. He is combative without charm, confrontational without insight, and delivers answers in a tone that feels more like a scolding than a conversation."

"The Trump White House insists CNN is scared to put Stephen Miller on air. They've turned the booking process into a three-day spectacle, complete with taunts, hashtags, and performative outrage. But the simplest explanation is also the truest: Stephen Miller is terrible television, and CNN has every right commercially and editorially to avoid subjecting its audience to him. This isn't ideological."

"CNN's reply was brief and telling: Miller and other administration officials are welcome, but the network makes editorial decisions based on news priorities, not White House demands. The statement wasn't defensive. It was dismissive signaling that CNN doesn't view Miller as a heavy hitter being denied a platform, but as a booking they have no use for right now. CNN's refusal isn't political; it's practical."

White House spokespeople framed CNN's avoidance of Stephen Miller as fear or censorship and turned the booking into a public spectacle. The simplest explanation is programming logic: Miller routinely fails to hold viewers' attention and therefore is commercially dispensable. His on-air manner is combative without charm, confrontational without insight, and often feels like a scolding rather than a conversation. Viewers change the channel when he appears, and producers avoid guests who drive audiences away. CNN says it welcomes administration officials but makes editorial decisions based on news priorities, not White House demands, framing the refusal as practical rather than political.

Read at www.mediaite.com