CATO has developed six models to explain the actions of DOGE, aimed at addressing uncertainties regarding its role in federal government dynamics. These models, which include theories related to progressive influence purging, public relations campaigns, and cronyism, help in analyzing past decisions and predicting future behavior. While some models may hold validity, others face challenges due to the failures associated with DOGE's implementation. The article emphasizes that without a comprehensive understanding, significant policy initiatives may be misconstrued up to the risk of critical backlash.
DOGE’s actions are concerning, as they represent a lack of strategic coherence and a failure to maintain fiscal responsibility, which may lead to a backlash.
Part of analyzing DOGE is to consider how it fits into broader trends of policy-making, including the need for clarity and accountability in government initiatives.
Collection
[
|
...
]