The article critiques Elon Musk's DOGE as a dangerous initiative disguised as a government efficiency strategy. It argues that the real aim is to undermine corporate oversight, consumer protection, and civil rights by radical proponents. Concerns are raised about Musk's associates accessing sensitive public data without adequate security. Additionally, the integration of Starlink, Musk's satellite internet service, into the White House's telecom network is presented as a possibly misguided effort, lacking coherent rationale beyond creating the appearance of utility in governance.
It's best to view Elon Musk's DOGE as an attack. While right wing propaganda frame DOGE as a 'cost saving' effort, that's just flimsy cover for its real purpose: dismantling corporate oversight, environmental guard rails, consumer protection, civil rights, and the social safety net by weird zealots.
There were already widespread concerns about Musk's tween 4chan brats having access to sensitive public information with no real oversight. The randos around Trump and Musk also appear to access this data using unsecured personal devices.
Now there's reporting suggesting that Musk is casually integrating Starlink systems into the White House telecom network for no coherent reason outside of the fact it gives the illusion that it's helping: 'Starlink...is now accessible across the White House campus... since Mr. Musk joined the Trump administration as an unpaid adviser.'
Collection
[
|
...
]