In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court curtailed federal judges' ability to issue universal injunctions, bolstering executive authority and complicating checks on potentially illegal presidential actions. This decision arose from a case challenging Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship, yet the Court sidestepped that issue, instead emphasizing the constraints on judicial relief against such orders. Critics, including legal scholars, argue this undermines judicial independence and signals a dangerous shift toward unchecked executive power, particularly in light of various contentious policies under Trump's administration.
The Supreme Court has restricted federal judges' ability to issue universal injunctions, undermining judicial authority and allowing the executive branch greater latitude to enact potentially illegal policies.
This unprecedented ruling signifies a troubling shift in the balance of power among the branches of government, raising concerns about judicial independence and accountability.
Collection
[
|
...
]