"While other nations have made strides toward accountability and the shunning of disgraced figures, the U.S. response has devolved into a partisan circus. On one side, Make America Great Again (MAGA) loyalists suggest that the mountain of unreleased and redacted documents somehow absolves President Donald Trump of wrongdoing, despite evidence to the contrary. On the Democratic Party side, Bill and Hillary Clinton seek to dismiss congressional investigations into their relationship with Epstein as a partisan distraction."
"While the Epstein Files Transparency Act explicitly prohibited withholding records based on "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity," it permitted exceptions for content that "depict or contain child sexual abuse materials (CSAM)," "contain personally identifiable information of victims or victims' personal and medical files," or "would jeopardize an active federal investigation." However, even the DOJ admits that the survivors, whom the redactions were ostensibly designed to protect, have been failed by the system as their names and nude images were made public."
Political factions have turned the Epstein records into a partisan battleground, with MAGA loyalists claiming unreleased and redacted documents absolve President Donald Trump and Bill and Hillary Clinton dismissing congressional probes as partisan. The Epstein Files Transparency Act barred withholding records for embarrassment or political sensitivity but allowed exceptions for CSAM, victim-identifying information, and active investigations. Despite those limits, redactions exposed survivor names and nude images, and mounting evidence indicates redactions were used to protect criminals rather than victims. Millions of files remain unreleased, including records of reviews conducted by Bondi, Patel, and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche.
Read at Truthout
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]