The Supreme Court has reopened the case of Brenda Andrew, the only woman on death row in Oklahoma, after concerns arose regarding the fairness of her trial. The Court stated that prosecutors may have compromised her right to a fair trial by introducing excessively prejudicial evidence concerning Andrew's sexual life and maternal abilities. This included testimony about her sexual partners and personal choices, culminating in a dramatic courtroom moment where the prosecution presented her underwear as evidence against her, suggesting it indicated intent to flee after her husband's murder. Andrew's chance for a new trial hinges on these issues.
The Supreme Court's decision highlights significant concerns about prosecutorial conduct, particularly regarding the introduction of inflammatory evidence related to the defendant's sexual history.
Evidence presented during Brenda Andrew's trial included details of her sexual activities over two decades, significantly influencing perceptions of her character and trial outcome.
Collection
[
|
...
]