Amid rising pressure to address antisemitism, Harvard University faces potential federal funding cuts from the Trump administration, which is reviewing around $9 billion in contracts. Accusations claim Harvard is neglecting the protection of Jewish students and prioritizing divisive ideologies. Faculty members are divided, with many urging a stronger defense against political attacks. The situation highlights the broader dilemma universities face: should they protect their interests or stand firmly on their principles? Critics express concern that Harvard's cautious approach is a capitulation during a time of increasing authoritarianism.
"As much as a body blow from the administration would hurt us, Harvard has the capacity to withstand the blow," said Steven Levitsky, a Harvard political science professor who circulated the letter.
In recent months, it had moved cautiously, seeking compromise and, critics said, cracking down on speech.
Although it remains unclear how much the university will actually lose, if anything, the move Monday shows that the conciliatory approach hasn't fended off its critics yet.
Should they work to protect themselves, as many seem to be doing, or stand on principle?
Collection
[
|
...
]