Tim Walz’s performance was notably disjointed, peppered with platitudes, revealing a lack of command over key issues that likely hindered his effectiveness as a candidate.
Vance, on the other hand, demonstrated sharpness and an ability to stay on message during the debate, contrasting starkly with Walz's evident nervousness and unpreparedness.
Walz's responses were meandering, reflecting an inadequate grasp of the policies, as illustrated by his vague remarks on housing and immigration.
Despite being elevated by Vice President Kamala Harris, Walz’s lack of robust media interaction prior to the debate may have contributed to his underwhelming performance.
Collection
[
|
...
]