Richard A. Friedman emphasized that Trump’s performance in the debate was concerning, noting that assessing his cognitive fitness through standard mental health exams is inadequate.
Throughout the debate, Friedman's observations revealed Trump exhibited profound difficulties in maintaining a coherent train of thought, suggesting significant cognitive challenges.
Friedman observed that while Vice President Harris displayed some signs of rigidity, she ultimately communicated with coherence, contrasting sharply with Trump’s alarming presentation.
Friedman concludes that relying solely on simple cognitive tests is insufficient for evaluating political candidates in the high-stakes environment of a presidential debate.
[
Collection
]
[
|
...
]