"This affair raises urgent questions about foreign influence and national security. What did the Palace know? What did ministers know? What else is being hidden? This goes beyond what a court could reasonably consider. Parliament must consider what it means for the country. If the worst is proved, do we need to revisit treason laws written 700 years ago?"
"If these accusations are true, they expose something rotten at the top of the State. If they are not, the public needs proof that the guardrails are strong. Either way, Parliament must send a clear message - Britain will defend itself from every threat, even if it comes from the very top."
Tom Tugendhat calls for a special committee to examine Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Peter Mandelson over past associations with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, citing national security and foreign influence concerns. The proposed panel would include MPs, peers and retired judges empowered to summon witnesses, access relevant documents and take evidence under oath. The proposal follows renewed scrutiny of individuals who had contact with Epstein before his conviction. Supporters argue transparency is needed to maintain public confidence when senior figures are implicated. Critics warn that allegations such as treason carry narrow legal definitions and require clear statutory evidence.
Read at London Business News | Londonlovesbusiness.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]