The House of Lords has rejected the government's Data (Use and Access) Bill again, advocating for stronger copyright protections for the creative sector against AI exploitation. Baroness Kidron's proposed amendments demand transparency from AI companies on material sources and require permission from copyright holders. High-profile artists, including Sir Elton John and Paul McCartney, have vocally criticized the government's stance, equating unlicensed AI usage of creative works to theft. The Lords' defiance underscores a broader concern about government influence from major tech companies over the rights of UK creatives.
Baroness Kidron accused the government of being influenced by Silicon Valley to 'redefine theft' at the expense of UK creatives and copyright protections.
Support from artists like Sir Elton John indicates widespread concern that AI's use of copyrighted material without compensation is tantamount to theft.
Kidron's amendment aims to hold AI firms accountable by requiring them to disclose material sources and seek permissions from copyright holders.
The Lords' decisions reflect a strong push against the government's plans that some see as a direct threat to the integrity and rights of UK artists.
Collection
[
|
...
]