The article critiques the stagnation in Canadaâs political landscape, arguing that the focus has shifted from effective decision-making to message amplification. This trend has led to a culture of conformity where leaders avoid disagreement, exemplified by figures like Pierre Poilievre, who represent a broader fear of genuine discourse. Additionally, there is concern over the development of personality cults around unremarkable leaders while neglecting vital institutions that could help navigate today's complexities. The article calls for a reevaluation of what kind of country Canadians want amid this troubling trend in politics.
Canada's political landscape suffers from a decade of declining decision-making and a growing focus on messaging rather than on effective governance, pointing to a need for serious reevaluation.
The political discourse in Canada has become characterized by conformity and a fear of disagreement, which hampers constructive dialogue and the evolution of political thought.
Leaders are increasingly disconnected from genuine political engagement, leading to a cycle of superficiality where personality cults overshadow substantive issues that matter to Canadians.
The continuous neglect of institutional support in favor of unremarkable leaders indicates a dangerous trend in Canadian politics, hindering our ability to respond to complex challenges.
Collection
[
|
...
]