The article discusses the ongoing debate around the assisted dying bill, highlighting Kim Leadbeater's defense against claims of its impending collapse. She argues that many who abstain are consistently against the bill, while emphasizing its strong initial support in Parliament. Despite religious opposition, she points out that a majority of voters favor the right to die, rooted in decades of polling. With the debate returning to Parliament, MPs are reminded of the historical significance of private member's bills in effecting lasting social change, urging them to prioritize this issue over typical constituency duties.
The debate surrounding the assisted dying bill continues to ignite passions, as proponents like Kim Leadbeater assert the enduring public support for the right to die.
Leadbeater emphasizes that MPs must recognize the substantial backing for the bill among voters, a sentiment consistent since polling began in 1983.
The strong religious opposition, while significant, has dwindled in relevance to a largely atheistic public, whose majority favors an individual's right to choose.
Historically, transformative changes in legislations have often stemmed from private members' bills, challenging MPs to consider their lasting impact on societal freedoms.
Collection
[
|
...
]