Keir Starmer's government is advancing a measure to remove hereditary peers from the House of Lords, fulfilling a key manifesto promise. This change, aimed at aligning the Lords with modern democratic values, faces significant resistance from Conservative peers who advocate for the value of hereditary contributions to lawmaking. The historical context reveals that previous attempts at reform, notably during Tony Blair's administration, led to compromises that resulted in retaining some hereditary members. This ongoing debate underscores the broader constitutional challenges in overhauling the House of Lords to reflect contemporary Britain.
The hereditary principle in lawmaking has lasted for too long and is out of step with modern Britain; people should not be voting on our laws by accident of birth.
Labour's removal of hereditary peers is a landmark reform, but the party's historical compromises illustrate the constitutional difficulties of effectively reforming the House of Lords.
Collection
[
|
...
]