Global leaders have a selective view of sovereignty. It matters, as long as it's in their interests | Kenan Malik
Briefly

The article discusses the complex historical and political circumstances surrounding the Chagos Islands, emphasizing the disregard for sovereignty when it conflicts with national priorities. Britain, having colonized the islands and retained control for military purposes, forcibly displaced the Chagossians in the 1970s. Although a recent deal was made to transfer sovereignty to Mauritius, the US base in Diego Garcia will remain under UK control, perpetuating the Chagossians' marginalization. The article critiques the lack of agency for the affected population in decisions about their homeland.
Sovereignty matters. Except when it doesn't. And it doesn't when another people's sovereignty gets in the way of your nation's needs.
Britain wrested the Chagos archipelago from French rule in 1814 and retained it for geopolitical interests, resulting in the forced exile of the Chagosians.
The primary objective was to ensure that the islands could be used for defense facilities, notably an American naval base on Diego Garcia.
Britain's recent agreement to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius largely excludes the Chagossians' rights and needs from consideration.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]