"It felt like finding the perfect tool for my kit- the one that took the raw power of the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) but dressed it up in the super-smart, elegant clothes of Functional Programming (FP). We're talking about things like algebraic data types, no more worrying about mutable state, and this type system that seriously felt like a protective force field woven by some coding genius. It promised robust, clean, and honestly, just beautiful code."
"But here's the scoop, my confession: I'm moving on. Big time. It's 2026 now, and as my engineering squad plans to really scale up our platform and, frankly, keep our sanity, we're making the big switch away from Scala. This isn't me saying Scala is bad; it's brilliant! It's just me realizing that for 90% of the modern backend stuff we do, especially in a fast-paced environment, the price tag for that "elegance" is just too steep."
Scala combined JVM performance with functional-programming features such as algebraic data types, immutability, and a strong static type system, enabling robust and elegant code. Early microservices built in Scala were sharp, efficient, and well-architected. Over time, operational and cognitive costs of Scala's complexity became apparent for typical backend work. By 2026, engineering teams planning to scale prioritized productivity, maintainability, and sanity, prompting a migration away from Scala for most services. The decision reflects a judgment that the language's elegance and safety often impose excessive development and maintenance overhead for routine, fast-paced backend requirements.
Read at Medium
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]