"There was a time when I refreshed my follower count like it held the key to my self-worth. Every new subscriber felt like a win. Every unfollow felt like a setback. I told myself I was "building an audience," but really, I was chasing validation dressed up as growth. Then something shifted. I noticed how the accounts that inspired me didn't just have large followings - they had familiar names in their comment sections. Real people. Loyal readers. Conversations, not just impressions."
"But the truth is, numbers are like empty calories - they fill your ego but not your purpose. We post something that resonates and feel a quick hit of validation. Then the algorithm moves on, and so do the people who double-tapped it. The problem isn't that growth is bad; it's that most of it isn't real. There's a difference between being seen and being remembered."
Chasing follower counts became a substitute for self-worth, producing quick validation but little lasting connection. Accounts that inspire show familiar names in comments, signaling real people, loyal readers, and conversations rather than impressions. Measuring progress by recognized names emphasizes trust, resonance, and genuine connection over numeric reach. Slow, consistent growth creates roots that turn followers into friends and commenters into community. Authenticity and showing up consistently earn familiarity that algorithms cannot manufacture. Networking and performative outreach often feel empty compared with earned relationships. The most valuable metrics are recurring, engaged individuals who remember, interact, and act on shared content.
Read at LEVEL Man
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]