Social media platforms have faced intense criticism over their monopolistic tendencies and failure to moderate harmful content, leading to public calls for alternative, public social networks. This idea, supported by various European leaders, envisions platforms that prioritize user safety and transparency over ad revenue. Advocates argue that such networks could foster healthier public discourse without exploiting user data. Experts like James Muldoon emphasize the importance of moderation in creating neutral spaces for citizens to engage in discussions on political and social issues, free from the harmful practices seen in current platforms.
Until a decade ago, social media presented itself as a space for exchanging ideas. Now, platforms act as quasi-monopolies prioritizing ad revenue over user safety.
Proposals for public social media networks have emerged, suggesting alternatives could lead to more responsible and transparent platforms that do not exploit user data.
James Muldoon argues that public platforms should be neutral, moderated spaces that facilitate difficult conversations on political and social issues without engaging in harmful practices.
Calls from European leaders for public social networks highlight growing discontent with current social media practices and suggest a shift towards user-oriented platforms.
Collection
[
|
...
]