Human beings thrive in groups, deriving security and identity through strong affiliations. While belongingness positively influences wellbeing, it can also lead to in-group bias and devaluation of outsiders. Healthy group identification promotes self-esteem, but extreme loyalty can produce rigidity and hostility. This phenomenon applies to national identity, where constructive patriotism benefits both individuals and nations. Conversely, rabid nationalism and blind patriotism yield detrimental outcomes, illustrating that excessive group allegiance can result in national narcissism, mirroring individual narcissism's negative consequences.
Human beings can survive and thrive only in groups. Strong group affiliations are essential for identity and wellbeing, reflecting a deep-seated need for belongingness.
At its extreme, group loyalty may become harmful when blind devotion leads to hostility towards outsiders, creating a rigid and inflexible identity.
National narcissism mirrors individual narcissism and results in poor outcomes, demonstrating that excessive identification with one's group can have damaging effects.
Constructive patriotism is linked to positive outcomes, while extreme forms of national identification, such as rabid nationalism, correlate with broader negative consequences.
Collection
[
|
...
]