The article discusses the complexities of ethics in therapy, particularly when serving low-income clients. While some therapists argue that treating them at less desirable times is unethical, the author cites personal experiences that highlight the importance of offering care, even if it differs from standard practices. It emphasizes the need for a more compassionate, human-centered ethical approach rather than a strict commitment to equality, which can perpetuate injustices in healthcare access and quality for underserved populations.
Treating everyone the same can reinforce injustice. Client autonomy may be compromised by strict codes. A human-centered, nuanced ethical approach is essential.
My fellow therapists argued that low-income clients would feel 'less than' if treated at undesirable times, emphasizing equality over superior care.
My experience with government assistance revealed disparities in healthcare. A private practitioner offering limited weekend care could significantly improve access for underserved populations.
The idea that it is better for a professional to deny care altogether than to provide it under less-than-ideal circumstances is deeply problematic.
Collection
[
|
...
]