The U.S. Supreme Court seems poised to rule that plaintiffs alleging reverse discrimination do not need to provide more evidence than minority plaintiffs when claiming job bias. The court’s apparent consensus emerged during arguments regarding Marlean Ames's case, where she alleges she was passed over for promotions in favor of less-qualified gay colleagues. The 6th Circuit Courts dismissal hinged on whether Ames provided necessary 'background circumstances' to strengthen her claims, highlighting ongoing debates surrounding discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Justice Neil Gorsuch observed that there is 'radical agreement' among the justices on applying the same test for discrimination claims by both majority and minority groups.
The 6th Circuit's decision to dismiss Ames' claim hinged on her failure to provide evidence of 'background circumstances' sufficient to establish reverse discrimination.
Ames contends that her demotion and loss of promotion are rooted in discriminatory practices targeting her for being a straight white woman.
Reverse-discrimination plaintiffs may have a strengthened position if the Supreme Court legitimizes their claims by applying equal standards as those placed on minority group plaintiffs.
Collection
[
|
...
]