The article explores the effects of a recent boycott aimed at capitalism and big businesses, noting that consumer activity appeared largely normal despite participation claims. Observations from various locations showed regular shopping patterns, indicating that the boycott did not significantly affect businesses. The organizer admitted that the economic impact would likely be minimal. The vague nature of the boycott made it difficult for participants to agree on specific goals or demands, leading to questions about its effectiveness and long-term implications.
In this case the target seemed to be capitalism and 'big business' in general, and the guidelines were so vague that people were adding their own personal categories.
I have no doubt that some (maybe a lot) participated, but I never thought it would send the significant economic message people hoped for.
'Will it really affect the economy much? Probably not. And we know that,' - Scripps News.
Assuming you had been successful, how were you going to agree on what your ultimate demands would be?
Collection
[
|
...
]