The article explores the tension between Elon Musk and Neil deGrasse Tyson, particularly regarding Musk's SpaceX ventures into outer space, which Tyson argues have not surpassed NASA's historical achievements. Tyson highlights that space exploration has traditionally been government-led due to the substantial financial and risk factors involved. He asserts that while private enterprises can offer advancements, they typically follow government initiatives and seek clear financial returns, unlike governments that prioritize geopolitical outcomes.
One would count neither Elon Musk nor Neil deGrasse Tyson among the most reserved public figures of the twenty-first century.
The actual space frontier is still held by NASA.
Nations lead expensive projects, and when the costs of these projects are understood, private enterprise comes in later.
Governments don't need a financial return on investment if they can get a geopolitical return on investment.
Collection
[
|
...
]