Clojure vs. Other Functional Programming Languages: A Quick Comparison
Briefly

Clojure has emerged as a leading functional programming language, distinguished by its Lisp-based syntax, dynamic typing, and JVM integration. Compared to Haskell, Clojure offers flexibility and real-world practicality, while Haskell's strong static typing upholds functional purity. Scala's combination of paradigms provides familiarity to Java developers, although Clojure's simplicity enhances code maintainability. Elixir, designed for distributed systems, contrasts with Clojure's broader application scope in web and data-driven environments. Ultimately, each language fulfills different needs, positioning Clojure as an ideal choice for simplicity and interoperability.
Clojure offers flexibility with dynamic typing, making it practical for real-world applications, while Haskell enforces strict functional purity with a strong static type system.
Clojure's simplicity leads to better code maintainability, making it suitable for smaller, agile teams, in contrast to Scala's type safety that catches errors at compile time.
Elixir is ideal for distributed and fault-tolerant systems, whereas Clojure's JVM integration broadens its use across web development, data science, and AI applications.
If you prioritize simplicity and JVM interoperability, Clojure stands out among functional programming languages, contrasting with Haskell's focus on pure functional programming.
Read at Medium
[
|
]