Debate over changes to San Francisco's Great Highway intensify with Prop K
Briefly

As we consider the implications of Prop K, it’s essential to recognize that the pilot project during the pandemic showed us the potential for a vibrant community space. By closing just a portion of the Great Highway permanently, we can not only enhance access to our coast but also redesign our urban landscape to prioritize pedestrians and cyclists. This initiative has the potential to rejuvenate local businesses and foster a healthier community for residents and visitors alike.
Opponents argue that Closure of part of the Great Highway under Prop K would introduce further congestion onto side streets, citing concerns about safety for children playing nearby. Many believe that if the highway remains active, it would alleviate additional pressure on local roadways. They point out that current usage patterns—walking, biking, running—demonstrate a need for coexistence rather than partitioning the highway. It's a matter of balancing convenience and safety for all road users.
Read at ABC7 San Francisco
[
]
[
|
]