Scientist Whose Work Led FDA To Ban Food Dye Red No. 3 in January Says Agency Overstated Risk
Briefly

from www.scientificamerican.com1 month ago
The FDA announced a ban on red dye No. 3 based on a single 1987 study that suggested potential carcinogenic properties. This decision sparked debate, as the study's lead author, Joseph Borzelleca, contended that his research found no cancer risk for humans. Despite earlier FDA decisions influenced by Borzelleca's study, a renewed push by consumer advocates finally led to the ban during President Biden's term. The situation remains complex, reflecting ongoing tensions between regulatory actions and scientific interpretations.
If I thought there was a problem, I would have stated it in the paper... I stand by the conclusions in my paper that this is not a problem for humans.
www.scientificamerican.comhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-study-led-fda-to-ban-food-dye-red-no-3-but-he-says-the-additive/
Soon after Borzelleca's paper was published in a scientific journal... the FDA examined the data his team had collected and reached its own conclusion: that the dye caused cancer in male lab rats.
www.scientificamerican.comhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-study-led-fda-to-ban-food-dye-red-no-3-but-he-says-the-additive/
In 1992, the FDA said it wanted to revoke approval of Red 3 in food and drugs. But the agency didn't act at the time, citing a lack of resources.
www.scientificamerican.comhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-study-led-fda-to-ban-food-dye-red-no-3-but-he-says-the-additive/
More than 30 years later, after a renewed push by consumer advocates, the Biden administration announced the ban in its last days in power.
www.scientificamerican.comhttps://www.scientificamerican.com/article/scientists-study-led-fda-to-ban-food-dye-red-no-3-but-he-says-the-additive/
Read at www.scientificamerican.com
#fda #red-dye-no-3 #food-safety #carcinogens #consumer-advocacy
[
|
]