The State Department is described as a bureaucratically bloated institution that has lost its effectiveness after the Cold War, fostering a culture marked by risk aversion and infighting. Early experiences in the Foreign Service highlighted a disconnection from diplomatic priorities, with emphasis on ceremonial tasks. Recent staff cuts have raised concerns about the future of diplomacy, but many insiders acknowledge systemic inefficiencies and fear the reputation-driven culture within the department. The narrative suggests essential reforms rather than lamenting cuts, reflecting a call for a window to reevaluate the institution's relevance and operations.
The State Department is described as a bloated, overly bureaucratic institution that has lost its effectiveness since the end of the Cold War, showcasing risks in its approach.
Staff cuts at the State Department have been met with claims that they will harm diplomacy, yet these claims are countered by existing issues within the institution's culture.
Collection
[
|
...
]