The Trump administration's recent efforts against Harvard and other universities include plans to revoke their tax-exempt status, a drastic step with severe financial implications. Tax-exemption is crucial not only for saving costs but also for enabling fundraising through charitable deductions. The administration's lack of clear rationale raises concerns about a broader agenda aimed at challenging universities deemed left-leaning, with the precedent set by Bob Jones University v. United States being pivotal in this strategy to reconsider the criteria for tax-exempt status under section 501(c)(3).
The Supreme Court precedent allowing the IRS to revoke a university's tax-exempt status is a textualist's nightmare.
Losing exemption from income taxation would be disastrous for Harvard, which also relies on it for charitable deductions essential for fundraising.
The rationale for the IRS revisiting Harvard's exemption status is not clearly articulated by the Trump administration, indicating a troubling intellectual agenda.
Bob Jones University v. United States has become a unifying theory for challenging universities' exempt status, particularly those perceived as left-leaning.
Collection
[
|
...
]