The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to support South Carolina's decision to cut Medicaid funds from Planned Parenthood, impacting women's healthcare access. Justice Gorsuch's opinion revolves around the interpretation of 'qualified' institutions and suggests states can define qualifications at their discretion. The ruling stems from a legal challenge by Julie Edwards, who sought care at Planned Parenthood, highlighting significant implications for abortion rights and healthcare availability for women. Governor Henry McMaster endorsed the decision, reflecting further ideological support for restricting abortion access amid ongoing legal battles.
In his opinion, Gorsuch points to the word "qualified" in the federal statute, and suggests that states can make their own determinations is an institution is "qualified" at their discretion.
The main plaintiff in the case, a South Carolina woman named Julie Edwards, said that she preferred to use a Planned Parenthood office near her for gynecological care.
This ruling strikes a blow to women’s health and choice over their own healthcare, showcasing the ideological divide in the Supreme Court decisions.
Governor McMaster, who remains in office, put out a celebratory statement... asserting state discretion over Medicaid fund allocation.
Collection
[
|
...
]