Congressional Republicans are facing pressure to cut Medicaid funding in order to finance tax cuts and defense spending linked to Donald Trump's agenda. The proposed budget-reconciliation bill suggests cuts of up to $900 billion, presenting the reduction as a means to eliminate 'waste' without impacting healthcare coverage. However, this has raised concerns about the implications of increased bureaucratic hurdles and work requirements for beneficiaries, which may inadvertently disenfranchise many who rely on Medicaid for essential health services. The narrative around these cuts is contested, especially given Medicaid's popularity and the moral implications of such austerity measures.
The arithmetic and politics of the budget-reconciliation bill that will deliver Trump's tax cuts and his defense and border-security spending have led to Medicaid bearing a lot of the brunt of generating money for other purposes.
The first, and most easily exploded, myth is that they are simply getting rid of 'waste, fraud, and abuse' in Medicaid without affecting the health-care benefits of any actual human beings.
What this means in English is that they hope a significant number of Medicaid beneficiaries get tripped up by a new blizzard of bureaucratic paperwork and get kicked out of the program.
Sounding reasonable, the proposed work requirement for 'able-bodied' adults receiving benefits has several devils in the details, complicating the narrative of deserving versus undeserving beneficiaries.
Collection
[
|
...
]