A vacation home bought in 2008 for $385,000 is now worth $830,000. Selling it can create a long-term capital gain after subtracting cost basis and documented improvements. The $250,000 Section 121 exclusion generally applies only when the property was owned and used as a primary residence for two of the past five years. A weekend cabin typically does not meet those requirements, so the gain becomes taxable. Federal long-term capital gains tax may apply at a 15% rate, and California taxes capital gains as ordinary income at a marginal rate around 9.3%. Combined taxes can reduce net proceeds substantially, creating a cash-flow gap before Social Security and required withdrawals begin.
"Per IRS Publication 523, the Section 121 exclusion requires owning and using the property as a primary residence for two of the past five years. A weekend cabin almost never qualifies. This scenario shows up constantly on Reddit's r/retirement and r/personalfinance boards, and on call-in shows like Clark Howard's, where listeners assume the $250,000 home sale exclusion applies to any house they own. It does not."
"Start with the gain. A sale price of $830,000, minus the $385,000 cost basis and roughly $50,000 in qualifying improvements (new roof, deck rebuild, kitchen remodel, all documented under IRS Publication 523), leaves a long-term capital gain of approximately $395,000. Federal long-term capital gains tax would likely apply at a 15% rate for most of that gain at this income level, creating an estimated federal tax bill of about $59,000."
"California taxes capital gains as ordinary income, and a marginal state rate of roughly 9.3% on the $395,000 gain adds another $36,700. That reduces the net proceeds from $830,000 to around $735,000. The size of that gap matters because it arrives during the sam"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]