CalSTRS Retirees Could Collect Thousands in Retroactive Social Security After Fairness Act
Briefly

CalSTRS Retirees Could Collect Thousands in Retroactive Social Security After Fairness Act
A widow with a CalSTRS pension of $4,800 per month lost her husband at 72 and was owed a Social Security survivor benefit of $3,100 per month. Under the old Government Pension Offset, her survivor benefit would be reduced by two-thirds of her teacher pension, wiping out the $3,100 check. The Social Security Fairness Act signed in January 2025 ended that offset for public retirees and made benefits payable retroactive to January 2024. Back pay can arrive as a large lump sum, with ongoing monthly payments and future cost-of-living adjustments. Taxes may increase because up to 85% of Social Security can be taxable when combined income exceeds thresholds. A lump-sum election under Internal Revenue Code section 86(e) can recalculate the taxable portion as if each retro month was received in the year it was owed, using prior-year income.
"Under the old Government Pension Offset (GPO), the survivor benefit she stood to receive was reduced by two-thirds of her teacher pension. Sixty-six percent of $4,800 is $3,200, which wiped out the entire $3,100 check before she ever saw it."
"The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law in January 2025, ended that offset for public retirees. CalSTRS members are among the largest groups impacted in the country, and financial planning boards are full of widows describing the same shock: they were told for years that survivor benefits would be zero, so many never applied."
"The law made benefits payable retroactive to January 2024, so anyone applying now is owed back pay for the months in between. For this widow, roughly 28 months at $3,100 lands near $86,800 in a single deposit, with the $3,100 a month continuing forward plus future cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs)."
"The lump-sum election under Internal Revenue Code §86(e) addresses exactly this. It lets her recalculate the taxable portion of the retro payment as if each month had been received in the year it was owed, using each prior year's income. She still pays the tax in the current year, but the math runs against 2024 and 2025 income, which were lower because the survivor check didn't exis"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]