"Being offended is a reasonable response to your wife's insult. Getting circumcised is less reasonable. You have a third option, though: neither. You can continue respecting your wife's choice, as unenlightened as it may strike you (and, in my opinion, is). Luckily, you have a workaround in your frequenting of sex parties/clubs. Indeed, that which revealed your wife's distaste for foreskin is also your venue for getting yours slurped on."
"Not everyone will share your wife's attitude, and that can be your way of getting from others what she won't give you. This is one of the main advantages of being open: It can liberate our partners from any shred of feeling obligated to do that which we love but doesn't interest them. You simply get it elsewhere. Is it ideal? Perhaps not, but given that there will be a lot of people willing to give you what you"
A partner refuses oral sex because of a dislike for uncircumcised penises, offering circumcision as a condition. Feeling offended by that dismissal is reasonable. Circumcision is presented as a less reasonable response, being a serious procedure that requires weeks of abstinence to heal and involves removing foreskin nerve endings. Open-sex venues and sex parties provide alternatives where others may be willing to perform the desired act. Respecting a partner's sexual boundaries is valid, and seeking willing partners elsewhere can deliver sexual satisfaction without surgically altering oneself to meet a partner's preference.
Read at Slate Magazine
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]