I Spent $100K Fighting My Ex and Now My Boyfriend Wants to Support Me: Should I Let Him?
Briefly

I Spent $100K Fighting My Ex and Now My Boyfriend Wants to Support Me: Should I Let Him?
A single mother asked whether she should let her new boyfriend support her and her nine-year-old so she could work less. She worried about financial exposure, resentment, and feeling like she was taking more than was fair. The response emphasized legal vulnerability: building a life together without a foundation leaves both parties exposed if the relationship ends. Marriage triggers laws covering asset division, support obligations, survivor benefits, tax filing, inheritance, and healthcare decision standing. An unmarried partner generally keeps only what is in her own name, especially if she reduced work to care for a child. The scenario also showed how stepping back from work can create large long-term income and retirement losses.
"“Attaching yourself to a boyfriend, no matter how stable he is, how great of a guy he is: he might be awesome: that still puts you in a very vulnerable position, right? Because you're trying to build something, you're trying to build a house without a foundation, without legal protection.”"
"“Marriage triggers a body of law: equitable distribution of assets, spousal support, survivor benefits under Social Security, tax filing status, automatic inheritance in most states, and standing in healthcare decisions. A boyfriend, no matter how committed, triggers none of those.”"
"“If the relationship ends, an unmarried partner who scaled back her career to care for a child generally walks away with what is in her own name. Period.”"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]