"Well, the answer does depend on the person and the circumstances of the dates. Dates are, in essence, experimental samples of what the person may be really like. Naturally, the more samples you have, the more accurate picture you'll have. At the same time, each date does come with a cost in time, effort, and faith in humanity. Therefore, you don't necessarily want to be saying,"
"One thing's for sure. One date is not enough to rule someone in as a keeper. Real life isn't The Notebook or The Little Mermaid, where you can rely on love at first sight. One date means that you've seen the person in exactly one set of circumstances and at one point in time. If the date went well, then it's enough to tell you that a second date is worthwhile for a second look. But not much more."
A person can present a false image that may not emerge until seen in different settings. Nervousness and other factors can prevent someone from showing true nature on a first date. Dates function as experimental samples of real behavior, so more dates create a clearer picture. Each date requires time, effort, and emotional investment, meaning excessive sampling is costly. One date can serve as a rough screen but cannot confirm long-term suitability. Three to five dates often provide sufficient varied interaction to balance information gain and resource expenditure before deciding whether to proceed.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]