Zillow contends that Compass's delay of nearly three months in filing the lawsuit undermines its claims of facing an emergency or 'irreparable harm.' The company argues that by proposing a three-month schedule for dispute resolution, Compass does not demonstrate urgency. Zillow maintains that the injuries alleged by Compass can be compensated through damages if successful in court and that the request for discovery is not necessary to mitigate irreparable harm. Additionally, Zillow indicates Compass's failure to plausibly establish antitrust standing and related issues.
"Compass's claimed irreparable injury and need for urgent relief ring hollow when Compass waited nearly three months to bring suit and is willing to wait three more months before any hearing on its motion."
"Nowhere does the Discovery Motion articulate why any evidence is necessary to decide the PI Motion or avoid irreparable harm; this is not a situation, for example, where evidence may be lost."
Collection
[
|
...
]