Gripping account of psychology's cautionary tale is marred by flawed assumptions
Briefly

The article discusses the rise and fall of social priming research, highlighting the initial excitement around findings that words associated with aging affected behavior. This enthusiasm was short-lived as efforts to replicate the original findings failed, spurring a reproducibility crisis in psychology. Ruth Leys' book, "Anatomy of a Train Wreck," critiques how a celebrated breakthrough became an example of the pitfalls in scientific research. It explores the gap between popular interpretations and the nuanced realities of psychological research, emphasizing the need for rigorous replication in studies of human behavior.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of social psychology, findings that initially seem groundbreaking may lead to significant setbacks, as evidenced by the failure to replicate key priming results.
Ruth Leys illustrates how what appeared to be a revolutionary finding in social priming ultimately became an emblematic cautionary tale about the scientific process and the reproducibility crisis.
Read at Nature
[
|
]