"You can do everything reasonably possible for someone you love and still feel guilty. Not because you failed, but because caring places you close to suffering in a way that logic alone cannot undo. Guilt plays a complicated role here. In small doses, it can reflect care and commitment. It keeps people attentive and emotionally invested. But when guilt becomes untethered from actual control or wrongdoing, it starts to take a toll."
"Responsibility and control feel inseparable, but psychologically, they are not. Even when caregivers understand that they did not cause an illness and cannot change its course, they often still feel responsible for how things turn out. Research on attribution shows that feelings of responsibility can persist even when controllability is low or absent (Weiner, 2006). When someone is suffering, the mind searches for an explanation. In close relationships, that explanation often turns inward."
Caregivers can experience persistent guilt even after doing everything reasonably possible, because proximity to suffering triggers emotional responsibility separate from actual control. Small amounts of guilt can motivate attentiveness and commitment, but when guilt detaches from real causation it causes self-criticism, exhaustion, and a pervasive sense of failure. Responsibility often lingers despite lack of control, and love raises moral standards that make caregivers judge themselves more harshly. Caregiving frequently blurs effort and outcome, producing unrealistic expectations. Reducing excessive guilt preserves caregiver wellbeing without diminishing the quality of care.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]