The article highlights how undefined terms in pornography studies have led to inconsistent research outcomes. Participants often determine their understanding of 'porn', leading to varied definitions influenced by individual demographic factors. A study published in the Journal of Sex Research indicated that there is no universal agreement on what constitutes porn, with participants referencing a wide array of materials, from hardcore videos to mainstream films and catalogs. This inconsistency muddles findings on pornography’s effects, making it crucial for researchers to establish clear definitions in studies.
In studies assessing pornography's effects, it's surprisingly common for researchers to leave it up to participants to determine what does and doesn't count as porn.
One of the reasons we see conflicting results in pornography research is that different researchers use different—often undefined—parameters for 'porn'.
What individuals count as porn can vary drastically based on their demographic backgrounds, leading to inconsistencies in research findings and participant reports.
Learnings from a study published in the Journal of Sex Research reveal a significant lack of consensus among participants about what constitutes pornography.
Collection
[
|
...
]