Ninth Circuit Correctly Rules That Dating App Isn't Liable for Matching Users
Briefly

Ninth Circuit Correctly Rules That Dating App Isn't Liable for Matching Users
"Grindr is not liable for user actions due to Section 230 immunity, which protects platforms from being responsible for user-generated content and encourages free communication online."
"The Ninth Circuit upheld Grindr's Section 230 protections, affirming that the app cannot be deemed defective for enabling user connections leading to real-world harm."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Grindr, a dating app, cannot be held liable for real-world harm resulting from user interactions enabled on the platform. This decision relies on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects online platforms from liability for user-generated content. The case, Doe v. Grindr, involved a minor who misrepresented his age, leading to harmful encounters. The court maintained that legal recourse should focus on the perpetrators rather than the dating app, which plays a vital role in facilitating user communication.
Read at Electronic Frontier Foundation
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]