Joseph Nicholls, 43, displayed extreme anti-ULEZ sentiments, threatening workers via social media and email, which led to serious legal repercussions and public service responses.
Recorder Andrew Hammond emphasized, 'This case is not about ULEZ but the rule of law... [Your email] was a deliberate attempt on your part to intimidate other people.'
The prosecution outlined the severity of Nicholls' actions, stating that threatening employees carrying out public services undermines the essential safety and legality in such roles.
Judge Hammond criticized Nicholls' poor control and consequential thinking, highlighting that these offenses stemmed from a temperamental response rather than a principled stand against ULEZ.
Collection
[
|
...
]