The article asserts that pervasive data collection by government and social services has fueled a surveillance state, intensifying privacy erosion. It argues that marginalized communities suffer disproportionately, as granting consent often feels obligatory for accessing essential services like food, housing, and healthcare. Individuals in vulnerable positions are subjected to significant scrutiny and violations of their privacy on a daily basis. This unchecked data flow risks further disenfranchising the most at-risk populations, with potential consequences including financial hindrance, deportation, and systemic discrimination, revealing an urgent need for oversight and reform.
The mass collection of sensitive data by government and social services has emboldened the growing surveillance state, creating a reservoir that is far too accessible.
Privacy is a luxury in a world where everything from social media to streaming services require accepting a litany of disclaimers forcing consent of data collection.
Vulnerable individuals relinquish nearly every iota of personal information just to survive, rendering the right to privacy virtually nonexistent.
The ramifications in our society, particularly for the most vulnerable, will be devastating if the current trajectory of public service data-sharing continues.
Collection
[
|
...
]