Hafeman argues that the PTAB must address the alleged Sotera violation due to LG's involvement as a real party-in-interest, which complicates the invalidation process.
The appellate brief claims that the PTAB's analysis regarding the obviousness and claim construction was flawed, impacting the decision to invalidate Hafeman’s patent claims.
Hafeman’s patent, initiated in 2004, is designed for remote access control, aiming to protect intellectual property against tactics commonly used by large tech companies.
The involvement of LG Electronics and its collaboration with major firms like Google and Microsoft raises concerns about the fairness of patent challenges in the tech industry.
Collection
[
|
...
]