How Oracle took a security breach claim and made it worse
Briefly

Oracle is under scrutiny for its inadequate response to two reported data security breaches within a short period. Allegations surfaced regarding a breach of its login servers, which Oracle flatly denied, but subsequent investigations revealed inconsistencies. A leaked notification suggested sensitive data from Oracle Health's Cerner division was compromised. Infosec veterans criticized Oracle for their lack of transparency and possible deletion of evidence from the Internet, showcasing a concerning trend in incident communication strategies that prioritize minimal disclosure over accountability.
Oracle is facing backlash for its poor communication following two data security incidents, raising concerns about transparency and the handling of breach disclosures.
Following allegations of data breaches, Oracle's communication failures, including potential evidence deletion, highlight a troubling trend in corporate breach responses.
Infosec experts suggest that Oracle may have utilized the Internet Wayback Machine to erase traces of the breaches, raising serious ethical questions.
The current strategy of minimal disclosure may shield organizations temporarily from criticism, but it risks long-term reputational damage and trust erosion.
Read at Theregister
[
|
]