The recent ruling labels Google's search engine as an illegal monopoly, an overreach that threatens free enterprise and harms consumers while prioritizing political narratives over market realities.
Judge Mehta's ruling reflects an outdated belief that 'big is inherently bad.' This mindset negates the importance of consumer choice and innovation in a competitive market.
Despite acknowledging Google as 'the best search engine,' Mehta ruled against it due to perceived anti-competitive practices, lacking clear evidence of illegal behavior.
The implications of dismantling successful companies, as hinted in the remedies phase, risk significant harm to market dynamics and innovation, benefiting only less competitive rivals.
Collection
[
|
...
]