EFF argued the AADC's age estimation scheme and vague terms that describe amorphous 'harmful content' render the entire law unconstitutional. But the lower court also incorrectly suggested that many foundational consumer privacy principles cannot pass First Amendment scrutiny. That is a mistake that EFF asked the Ninth Circuit to fix.
In its brief, EFF argued that the AADC's age estimation scheme raises the same problems as other age verification laws that have been almost universally struck down.
[
add
]
[
|
|
...
]